Patch Burn Grazing

History

Land managers and researchers started patch burn grazing independently from each other when trying to solve the dilemma of how to perform prescribed fires without deferring grazing. Since the first paper was written on this topic in 1964 over 130 research articles have been published on its effects on livestock production, wildlife, plant diversity, soils, water and other ecological concerns in North America. Patch burn grazing uses grazing that is driven by fire, called pyric herbivory. We now know that this fire-grazing interaction is common with many wildlife species. It was and still is critical to the ecological structure, function, and organisms of not only North America but also Africa, Asia and Australia.

What is patch burn grazing?

The basic idea is that a portion of a pasture is burned using prescribed fire, the subsequent regrowth of plants attracts livestock to voluntarily concentrate their use on the recently burned area (called pyric herbivory) and other portions of the pasture receive rest from grazing. Another area of the pasture is then burned moving livestock use around the pasture and creating diversity in livestock forage resources, plant species, and wildlife habitat.

Here are some of the ecological and livestock production benefits to this management practice.

Ecological Benefits

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Vegetation Diversity and Structure

Patch burn grazing increases the species diversity and structural variability across the pasture when compared to traditionally managed pastures. In patches recently burned the concentrated grazing use suppresses large dominating perennial grasses which allows a greater abundance and diversity of broadleaf plants to grow. Patches differ in plant species that are most prevalent. In freshly burned patches sedges and grasses dominate. Broadleaf plants are common 1-2 year after fire and perennial grasses and shrubs are most prolific 2-3 years after fire. This increased variability in growth stage, structure and diversity provides habitat for a greater number of wildlife species.

Patch burn grazing effects on vegetation
Patch burn grazing effects on wildfire

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Wildfire

Although prescribed fire cannot prevent wildfires from starting, when combined with grazing, as in patch burn grazing, it can change fire behavior. When prescribed fire alone is compared to patch burn grazing, the later reduced fuel loads, flame lengths, and the rate at which the fire spread to a greater degree and for a longer period of time.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2578

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Wildlife

Read the article

Patch burn grazing provides diverse habitat for more wildlife species and a variety of habitat for individual species. The greater variability in plant species and plant structure created by patch burn grazing provides food and cover for wildlife species that require very different types of habitat.

Grassland bird species that benefit:

  • Dickcissel
  • Grasshopper Sparrow
  • Mountain Plover
  • Northern Bobwhite Quail
  • Great Prairie-Chicken

Mammals that benefit:

  • White-tailed deer
  • Elk
  • Bison
  • Mule deer
  • Bighorn sheep
  • Stone's sheep
  • Deer mice
  • Hispid pocket mice
  • Prairie vole
Patch burn grazing effects on wildlife

Livestock Benefits

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Forage Quality

Prescribed fire removes old dead standing plant growth from the previous years that is low quality and coarse. The regrowth after fire is highly digestible and very palatable across the patch decreasing the selectivity of only palatable species.

Cow-calf operations

Patch Burn Grazing for Cow-Calf Operations

Forage quality is the highest the first 150 days following fire. By burning more than once a year, cow-calf operations can provide high quality forage for a greatest proportion of the year (Allred et al. 2011). When July or August burns were conducted on research pastures in Oklahoma, managers were able to delay winter protein supplementation from Nov. 1st until January 1st, with no reduction in cow or calf performance.

Read the article

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Stocker Cattle Performance

An 11-year study in western Oklahoma compared stocker performance in patch burned pastures versus traditionally managed pastures. Researchers found that from 1999-2001 there was no statistical difference in stocker weight gains. Then in 2002 the stockers in the patch burn pastures started gaining more weight and continued to gain more weight through the end of the study in 2009 (Limb et al. 2011).

Read the article

Stocker cattle performance
Livestock performance during drought

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Livestock Performance During Drought

Under conventional management, livestock weight gains fluctuate between years, increasing when rainfall is high and decreasing when rainfall is low. With patch burn grazing, livestock weight gains are stabilized between years since cattle have access to areas with forage growth from both the current year as well as previous years.

Read the article

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on Grazing Distribution

Patch burn grazing attracts cattle to recent burned patches because of the highly palatable regrowth after fire. Steers tracked with GPS collars spent 70% of their time in the recently burned patch from April through September while steers in the annually burned pasture had more uniform use of the pasture (West et al. 2016).

Pyric-Herbivory and Hydrological Responses in Tallgrass Prairie

Grazing distribution
External parasites

Patch Burn Grazing Effects on External Parasites

Horn flies can increase stress, decrease grazing and reduce weight gains in livestock and while insecticides are the primary control method used, horn flies can develop resistance to these chemicals over time.

In patch-burn grazed pastures, there was a 41% reduction in horn flies on cattle when compared to traditionally managed pastures in Oklahoma and Iowa (Scasta et al. 2012).

Read the article